This reads like an ad in many ways… my suggestion would be to severely cut down on the number of links.

If you want to use IconDeposit as an example, it only needs to be linked up once - maybe twice.

Also not sure that there is a need to link to the Wikidot home page, since we're on the Wikidot blog already.

Might have some more feedback, but I'm on a phone at the moment so I'd rather not say much yet.

Post needs to be heavily edited IMO. Good start though.

May also be worthwhile asking Wikidot devs for permission to post.

I would like to see the important hint ( in my oppinion):
(Edit) If you ( the reader) , has built a new wiki - a near-finished site , than show it your friends, colleguas and also strangers to get a feeedback directly and to hear their critics in the most important moment: before it goes really public ( and without such last check you will have a lot of work to re-layout it if the reactions are hurting you.. :)

Edit forget to say ; well done!

Edit2 : sorry for the missunderstanding sentences… !!

Matt,

thanks! I have suggestions though — actually something I was hoping for.

Think about it: your story of IconDeposit rather than a guide to build wikis. More personal = win for everybody.

I think what you achieved with IconDeposit is tremendous. It's worth writing about it and it might be a great article.

Tell me what you think.

Any news on this? Cheers!

Thank you for fixing my typo Ed, had a few brews for Halloween.

What has happened?
Why have you changed your mind?