Comments for page "Wikidot Reliability at 99.85%"

(no title)

Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:23:02 +0000

Salute to Wikidot team!

(no title)

Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:56:29 +0000

Tuesday Rant is on holiday for a week. :-)

(no title)

Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:43:16 +0000

Where is Tuesday Rant XX ?

(no title)

Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:12:53 +0000

(Note that Wolfram Alpha tends to live in the domain of imaginary numbers. The actual daily visitors is nowhere as high as this.)

(no title)

Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:42:11 +0000

Traffic doubled since January… from 300,000 visitors per day to 600,000 per day. :-)

(no title)

Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:57:35 +0000

Check out what wolframAlpha says.

(no title)

Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:22:51 +0000

The actual downtime per month comes from very short unavailability periods, a minute or two per day, sometimes even less (but such periods are rounded up to full minutes). So even if a monitoring service cannot cannot access pages for a few seconds, full minute is accounted.

As Pieter says, we are gradually building more and more stable, reliable infrastructure for Wikidot. It is important for both our paid and free users — nobody likes to see "site down", either this is a business site, collaboration wiki or a personal blog.

(no title)

Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:57:26 +0000

Great uptime! Same as tsangk, I've never really experienced many issues with Wikidot. That may be because we're on the other side of the world to the US, but I think anyone can be happy with just an hour downtime per month.

A minute? I'm not complaining :) That'd be great.

(no title)

Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:33:35 +0000

Today I also checked out Google's new Site Performance tool, and:

On average, pages in your site take 1.1 seconds to load (updated on Nov 30, 2009). This is faster than 86% of sites.

This, as I believe, comes form their crawling statistics.

We are also reaching top 3,000 internet sites according to Alexa, or top 2,000 sites according Quantcast.

So not bad IMHO ;-)

(no title)

Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:04:18 +0000

These are good figures although it doesn't really surprise me. The underlying infrastructure of Wikidot has always seemed to be good and, odd things like Snow Leopard apart, the uptime has never really been an issue. I was reading an article a while back on the astonomical cost of getting to 5"9s", i.e 99.99999% - millions! So 2 "9s" is probably a more realistic target to shoot at. Well done.

Re: What causes this?

Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:51:01 +0000

When are peak times?

Peak times are during the US working day.

What causes wikidot to go down?

Very little, now :-)

What causes this?

Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:39:46 +0000

When are peak times? What causes wikidot to go down?

(no title)

Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:07:57 +0000

woot!! go wikidot!

(no title)

Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:49:15 +0000

I am really happy with Wikidot's current uptime.
It is more reliable than most other FREE web hosting providers :-)