Interest fact about the <div>, I revised the code but still no good. Strange this is that I've done this before here, check out the code.

We're not meant to be using this page any more… and questions for help should be directed to the community

Apart from that though, I'll see if I can help:

• You need to do what Steven told you to do and to use the prependLine and appendLine attributes.
• The ListPages module does not work in-line. You're trying to use it smack-bang in the middle of a table , which won't work. You need two tables, one for each ListPages module.
• Each individual result from your ListPages module should be on a new row. You were attempting to place them all on a single row. Are you sure that's what you wanted?

Try this code:

[[module ListPages category="wo-call" parent="." tags="call" order="created_at desc" _
prependLine="[[table]]" appendLine="[[/table]]" ]]
[[row]]
  [[cell]]
    Type: %%content{1}%%
    Date & Time: [%%link%% %%created_at|%a %D %I:%M %p%%]
    Action Required: %%content{3}%%
    Note: %%content{4}%%
    Description: %%content{2}%%
  [[/cell]]
[[/row]]
[[/module]]

[[module ListPages category="wo-call" parent="." tags="email" order="created_at desc" _
prependLine="[[table]]" appendLine="[[/table]]" ]]
[[row]]
  [[cell]]
    Type: %%content{1}%%
    Date & Time: [%%link%% %%created_at|%a %D %I:%M %p%%]
    Action Required: %%content{3}%%
    Note: %%content{4}%%
    Description: %%content{2}%%
  [[/cell]]
[[/row]]
[[/module]]

Sorry about posting in the wring place. :(

Originally I was trying to put it in a Double Table, but like you said, that won't work!

I did not want it all in just one row, but as more more complex 'double table' was not working I was stripping back the code, trying to find my error.

Tried the code and get the same result. Darn it!

Is there another way to do this?

Open up an image editing program and draw a rough outline of what you want… I'll fiddle around with it and see if I can get it working ;-)

Thanks for that Shane. I'll get it to u tomorrow. :)

Hi Shane,

here we go. Apologies for the shoddy workmanship. :)

Done… though I'm trying to figure out the best way to turn it into an include. That code is going to get very messy once you add code to the rest of the tabs :P

Yes, I do:

This page has a table that says “Also on this day:”. The first option in the list is its own page.

I recently noticed, the code for range="others" is slightly broken and instead it requires range="other". The fix is already scheduled. In the meantime, try to reproduce this problem with skipCurrent="true".

skipCurrent="true" works fine now… That's a funny bug!

The fix is scheduled, but when it's released, will we need to edit/save our pages for it to take effect?

ListPages is generated independently from pages, so you don't have to edit&save them. But as the results are cached for some time, you may to wait some time after the fix is there.

I just tried at flickr: space is actually a delimiter.
Gabrys has all right: by default space is a delimiter when entering Flickr tags but you enter "tags like this" between double quotes.

Yes, they can, so we must keep the syntax for FlickrModule.

we must keep the syntax for FlickrModule

Are you sure?

I think you can remove the comma delimiter as Gerdami wants. I looked closer at Flicker and while they do allow tags to be created with spaces, you must surround them with double quotes. Flicker then strips out the space(s) when forming the URL.

The Flickr tag :"still life" becomes "stilllife":
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/stilllife/

Here is a test page showing that "still life" and "stilllife" tags produce the same results.
http://myfamilyphotos.wikidot.com/sandbox:flickr-tags

As long as we know to tag our pages in a "Flickr friendly" way, we can use %%tags%% with the Flickr module if you change the code to support space-separated tags rather than comma-separated tags.

-Ed

Module FlickrGallery can stay like it is.
However, ListPages could render %%tags%% with commas in between tags, or let us choose the delimiter.

or let us choose the delimiter.

Good point. It would be nice if there was consistency between all modules on how tags are handled when passed as a parameter. I generally prefer comma-delimited simply because it's what I'm used to from the majority of other software packages I use. Plus, I think it's easier to read the code.

-Ed

order="created_at asc"

Order by ascending is the default — there is no “asc” attribute. If you really must have some sort of way to determine it's not descending, then just:

order="created_at desc desc"

which essentially turns into ascending.

Thanks guys, all sorted now. :)

Order by ascending is the default

Are you sure? Last night I left out the sort order from the attributes and it came back in descending order. In fact it's still there at the bottom of my page here and it's definitely in descending order.

I think you misunderstood me. If you specify an order, the default is “ascending” unless you add “ desc” to it.

[[module ListPages order="created_at"]]
[[module ListPages order="created_by"]]
[[module ListPages order="name"]]
[[module ListPages order="rating"]]
[[module ListPages order="comments"]]

However, if you fail to specify an order:

[[module ListPages]]

Thanks, now I understand.

Me too.
However, I don't think it's clever to have 2 default orders.

This does not work…

http://istorijska-biblioteka.wikidot.com/sandbox:sandbox

http://istorijska-biblioteka.wikidot.com/sandbox:_template

PS: As a matter of fact, I do not understand what's this for. Is this to list all pages with the number of views for each one, or to have at each page the number fo views for that particular page?

@Brunhilda: views is not implemented yet. All italic text in the design page is unimplemented. I've created a new ListPages documentation that should be more clear.

Ups! So that explains everything! :D Thanks, Pieter!

So we need a %%link_linked% then? =) This could get confusing…

Well, if you really need something like [http://your-site/some-page http://your-site/some-page], I would call this %%link_linked%%. But who needs this?

Exactly right :)
No, it's not needed as it can be done exactly as you've described. I was half joking / sarcastic. Sorry :)

I agree. Though zero is the first number, it doesn't make sense to use it anywhere else but programming.

0 is nothing. That is , a lack of anything, doesn't exist.
1 is something. it exists. it lives!

Though zero is the first number, it doesn't make sense to use it anywhere else but programming.

If only my bank manager would agree. Actually he thinks zero would be an improvement!

Rob

No, but I can see the confusion.

Look at these pages. Let's assume that each of these pages were created on the month that they are named:

• January
• February
• March
• April
• May
• June
• July
• August
• September

This code:
[[module ListPages order="created_at desc" limit="4"]]
* %%title%%
[[/module]]

Will render pages from newest to oldest:

• September
• August
• July
• June

I want those pages, but in the reversed order:

• June
• July
• August
• September

Ah, that makes sense. I think pieter mentioned something like created_at desc desc somewhere else. On the forums, maybe.

http://forum.wikidot.com/thread:scrollbar-and-order-of-threads-in-this-forum/comments/show#post-583460